LifeZette

Subscribe to LifeZette feed
Updated: 2 days 6 hours ago

Protestor Screams Like He/She/It Is Possessed By A Demon At Walsh’s Rally To End Child Mutilation

Sat, 10/22/2022 - 12:12

Imagine going this crazy over people saying you should mutilate children’s genitals.

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1ml5q2","div":"rumble_v1ml5q2"});

These people are pure evil and attempt to claim they have the moral high ground.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Be sure to stay up to date with the latest news on our Red Voice Media’s aggregate news homepage. You can also see all of our video content on our dedicated video page. Just want to see all of our different creator’s latest episodes? Check out our shows page. Want to see every piece of PREMIUM content all in one place? Yup, we’ve got that covered on our PREMIUM content page. Not a PREMIUM member yet? You can check it out with a ONE-DOLLAR Trial & go AD-FREE on Red Voice Media, get access to all the PREMIUM content from all of our different creators, support our Constitutional values and help keep Red Voice Media independent of any outside funding.

This piece was written by Red Voice Media on October 22, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Kari Lake Harnesses Her Inner Peter McCullough and Unloads an Array of Truth Bombs Against the Jab [VIDEO]
Kanye West Calls Piers Morgan A Karen To His Face On Live TV [VIDEO]
Kanye West Humiliates Piers Morgan On His Own Show [VIDEO]

Joe Biden Brings Back His Creepy Whisper To Threaten Gun Owners Before Yelling About Infrastructure

Sat, 10/22/2022 - 12:04

Does he think his weird whispering and yelling helps him get his message across?

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1ml3s2","div":"rumble_v1ml3s2"});

“I’m gonna eliminate assault weapons again. I promise. I did it once.” – Creepy Joe

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Be sure to stay up to date with the latest news on our Red Voice Media’s aggregate news homepage. You can also see all of our video content on our dedicated video page. Just want to see all of our different creator’s latest episodes? Check out our shows page. Want to see every piece of PREMIUM content all in one place? Yup, we’ve got that covered on our PREMIUM content page. Not a PREMIUM member yet? You can check it out with a ONE-DOLLAR Trial & go AD-FREE on Red Voice Media, get access to all the PREMIUM content from all of our different creators, support our Constitutional values and help keep Red Voice Media independent of any outside funding.

This piece was written by Red Voice Media on October 22, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Kari Lake Harnesses Her Inner Peter McCullough and Unloads an Array of Truth Bombs Against the Jab [VIDEO]
Kanye West Calls Piers Morgan A Karen To His Face On Live TV [VIDEO]
Kanye West Humiliates Piers Morgan On His Own Show [VIDEO]

Robert Kiyosaki Reveals The Reason He Is Endorsing Kari Lake At His First Ever Political Rally

Sat, 10/22/2022 - 11:58

“As a member of the US armed forces. We fought for freedom. We didn’t fight for Democrats, we didn’t fight for Republicans. We didn’t fight for liberals. We didn’t fight for conservatives. We fought for our freedoms” – Robert Kiyosaki

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1ml36y","div":"rumble_v1ml36y"});

“I’ve watched Kerry Lake evolve from a journalist to a leader and God Almighty, ladies and gentlemen, we need leaders” – Robert Kiyosaki

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Be sure to stay up to date with the latest news on our Red Voice Media’s aggregate news homepage. You can also see all of our video content on our dedicated video page. Just want to see all of our different creator’s latest episodes? Check out our shows page. Want to see every piece of PREMIUM content all in one place? Yup, we’ve got that covered on our PREMIUM content page. Not a PREMIUM member yet? You can check it out with a ONE-DOLLAR Trial & go AD-FREE on Red Voice Media, get access to all the PREMIUM content from all of our different creators, support our Constitutional values and help keep Red Voice Media independent of any outside funding.

 

This piece was written by Red Voice Media on October 22, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Kari Lake Harnesses Her Inner Peter McCullough and Unloads an Array of Truth Bombs Against the Jab [VIDEO]
Kanye West Calls Piers Morgan A Karen To His Face On Live TV [VIDEO]
Kanye West Humiliates Piers Morgan On His Own Show [VIDEO]

Tucker: Evan McMullen is Not An Independent, ‘He is a Liberal Democrat’

Sat, 10/22/2022 - 10:48

“Evan McMullen is anything but independent he is entirely controlled and has always been… His campaign has paid nearly $2 million to Democratic Party consulting services in the last year alone.” – Tucker Carlson

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1ml0zx","div":"rumble_v1ml0zx"});

“…a group of liberals in Washington and formally headed by Bill Kristol recruited a longtime federal bureaucrat called Evan McMullen and convinced him to run for president. McMillan didn’t seem like a presidential candidate. He was 40 years old, never married, and very obviously odd, very odd. He had no trouble raising money.” – Tucker Carlson

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Be sure to stay up to date with the latest news on our Red Voice Media’s aggregate news homepage. You can also see all of our video content on our dedicated video page. Just want to see all of our different creator’s latest episodes? Check out our shows page. Want to see every piece of PREMIUM content all in one place? Yup, we’ve got that covered on our PREMIUM content page. Not a PREMIUM member yet? You can check it out with a ONE-DOLLAR Trial & go AD-FREE on Red Voice Media, get access to all the PREMIUM content from all of our different creators, support our Constitutional values and help keep Red Voice Media independent of any outside funding.

This piece was written by Red Voice Media on October 22, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Kari Lake Harnesses Her Inner Peter McCullough and Unloads an Array of Truth Bombs Against the Jab [VIDEO]
Kanye West Calls Piers Morgan A Karen To His Face On Live TV [VIDEO]
Kanye West Humiliates Piers Morgan On His Own Show [VIDEO]

Steve Bannon Joins Tucker Carlson After Being Sentenced to Four Months In Prison

Sat, 10/22/2022 - 09:48

“The whole Justice Department under Merrick Garland has become radically partisan … After we win on November 8 — deliver this crushing blow … I strongly believe you’ll see Merrick Garland impeached next year by the new Congress.”

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1mj9mj","div":"rumble_v1mj9mj"});

“We have to win massively on the 8th, and then this new Congress has to really go and enforce the rule of law. And the way you enforce the rule of law is to start serious investigations … And after those investigations, start bringing articles of impeachment and throw these bums out.”

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Be sure to stay up to date with the latest news on our Red Voice Media’s aggregate news homepage. You can also see all of our video content on our dedicated video page. Just want to see all of our different creator’s latest episodes? Check out our shows page. Want to see every piece of PREMIUM content all in one place? Yup, we’ve got that covered on our PREMIUM content page. Not a PREMIUM member yet? You can check it out with a ONE-DOLLAR Trial & go AD-FREE on Red Voice Media, get access to all the PREMIUM content from all of our different creators, support our Constitutional values and help keep Red Voice Media independent of any outside funding.

This piece was written by Red Voice Media on October 22, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Kari Lake Harnesses Her Inner Peter McCullough and Unloads an Array of Truth Bombs Against the Jab [VIDEO]
Kanye West Calls Piers Morgan A Karen To His Face On Live TV [VIDEO]
Kanye West Humiliates Piers Morgan On His Own Show [VIDEO]

Trans Identifying Biological Male Making Video Game Where Players Kill Women Critical Of Radical Gender Theory

Fri, 10/21/2022 - 20:42

A 36-year-old biological male based out of Norway who identifies himself as a transgender woman has been working on a video game over the past few months where would-be players assume the role of a transgender character who kills biological women who are critical of the trans agenda and radical gender theory.

Sandra Moen, the biological male in question, has been hard at work since around July of 2022 with a reskinned version of the 1992 classic Wolfenstein 3D, where instead of players assuming the role of a spy escaping a prison in WW2 Germany as it is in the original game, gamers will play as a transgender woman (a.k.a., a biological male) and will proceed to “shoot gender fascists.”

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

The title of the work in progress is unsurprisingly called “Terfenstein 3D,” a play on the acronym “TERF” which is oft-touted by transgender activists as a pejorative aimed at biological women that stands for “trans-exclusionary radical feminist.”

Back in July, Moen shared a first glimpse at his work on unsettling misogynistic game centered around his fantasies of harming biological women, writing on Twitter, “I’m making a shooting game where you shoot gender fascists in a fictional universe (ala Wolfenstein 3D). I found out how to make directional sprites, now you can shoot the sex fascists in the back! The graphics of the enemy are a placeholder demo.”

Image Credit: Twitter

In the weeks and months that followed, Moen would continue to provide updates on his work on the game, gleefully boasting of additions of gore and even hinting that a woman depicted in the game is designed after someone she takes issue with.

“Made props, tables, chairs, vases, ceiling lamps…Maybe not so exciting even if it happens.”

Image Credit: Twitter

“Creating level art for better immersion. Do you see who this picture is of?”

Image Credit: Twitter

“Put blood on the walls, got a lot more gory!”

Image Credit: Twitter

“Driving to add level design tricks. The game is becoming beautiful, a piece of queer art. Do you think I’ll make money for this? However controversial, if it turns out to be too negative, I’ll shelve the whole thing.”

Image Credit: Twitter

“Then there are priests. Gender fascists allied themselves with Christian conservatives.”

Image Credit: Twitter

“Ever wanted to blow the face off a turf standing next to dangerous barrels? The game is being developed further, stay tuned.”

Image Credit: Twitter

Needless to say, the project of Moen’s hasn’t resonated terribly well with some of his fellow Norwegians, as Twitter commenters shared their take amid various posts of Moen’s to detail their utter disgust over the unnerving exploit.

“Love when the #BeKind movement shows its true face. It is said that imitation is the highest form of flattery, but personally, I am starting to get sick of men wearing wigs invading my and my sisters’ areas.”

“Ooo, so curious. Then tell us ‘Sandra.’ Which of us are you most sexually excited to kill?”

Image Credit: Twitter

“Distinguishing between the fictional and reality is not your strong side, Sandra. If you are going to imitate being a woman, it is wise to give women room to push what they see with their own eyes. It is only men who imitate being a woman quite badly who create such fictional universes.

Image Credit: Twitter

“You are incredibly childish, you clown. How old are you? Your nonsense here shows that the name you have chosen is just nonsense. Only male incels do that nonsense there. Get your act together and grow up. People should be allowed to have different opinions than you.”

Image Credit: Twitter

This reskinned version of Wolfenstein 3D isn’t the first time Moen has dipped his hands in making transgender-themed games, as he also created the game “Trans Agent X,” which he describes the game as “a sci-fi video game about trans people who visit a post-apocalyptic Earth in search of a lost artifact. Each enemy in the game depicts a narrative fragment of ‘treatment’ that trans people in Norway were subjected to at Rikshospitalet. These fragments are collected from the Norwegian transgender community, Norwegian media, and personal experience. The video game explores themes of growth, healing, and trauma.”

For those unfamiliar with Rikshospitalet, it is a real hospital based out of Oslo in Norway that transgender activists in the country hold a disdain for since the hospital isn’t quite as zealous as the trans activists are when it comes to chemically castrating youths.

Going back to Moen, his proverbial origin story as the woman-hating villain he is today dates back to 2017 when a biological woman was rightfully alarmed when he disrobed in the women’s locker room at the Student Union in Stavanger’s training center.

The biological woman was apparently an employee at the training center and told Moen that he had zero business in the women’s locker room – which led to Moen consulting Juridisk Rådgivning for Kvinner (Legal Advice for Women) who then helped file a complaint with the Equality and Discrimination Ombudsman on his behalf.

Luckily, the case went nowhere in terms of benefitting Moen, with the ombudsman finding that a biological woman aghast at Moen’s male appendage appearing in the women’s locker room is not ground for a harassment and discrimination case.

In an interview from September of 2021, Moen shared how ecstatic he was when Legal Advice for Women helped him with his case, despite losing the legal effort, telling outlet Journalen that it was “something the TERFs still complain about. I find that entertaining.” The unabashed misogynist likened his efforts of invading women’s spaces as a sort of neo-women’s rights endeavor, saying, “The fight for trans rights is in many ways the women’s fight of our time.”

In a podcast interview this past March, Moen revealed that his desire to indulge in the fantasy of being female originally derived from his consumption of online pornography depicting biological males who identified as transgender.

“I began to understand that I was trans when I came across pornography featuring trans women. I have never made the connection that ‘penis’ means ‘man.’ [The male performers] were women, but they had a penis. I began to question – if they have a penis, how could other people know that they were girls when they were children? And of course, they wouldn’t know. So then I started questioning – what if I am one of these pretty ladies, in reality?”

In a November 2020 article by trans agenda critic Genevieve Gluck, she dug into the obvious connection between the rise of transgenderism as a social contagion and the simultaneous rise of online pornography depicting transgenders.

“In recent years, trans pornography has soared in popularity. According to Pornhub’s metadata, both ‘trans’ and ‘transgender’ porn searches have more than quadrupled in the three years between 2014 to 2017 and, by 2018, ‘trans’ was ranked the fifth highest search term of the year.”

Tales about parents of young children who wound up developing ROGD (rapid onset gender dysphoria) have also shared accounts of how they eventually learned that exposure to transgender pornography online coincided with their children’s desire to cosplay as the opposite sex.

But in Moen’s case, despite him wanting to dress up like a woman, he clearly holds a violent grudge against biological women, as evidenced by his designing of this video game where he can bask in the fantasy of killing the women who’ve rightfully acknowledged him as a man.

People like Moen are not well, and their disturbing fetishes are edging all the more closer to enacting real-world violence.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 21, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Kari Lake Harnesses Her Inner Peter McCullough and Unloads an Array of Truth Bombs Against the Jab [VIDEO]
Kanye West Calls Piers Morgan A Karen To His Face On Live TV [VIDEO]
Kanye West Humiliates Piers Morgan On His Own Show [VIDEO]

Kari Lake And Governor Glenn Youngkin Light Up Tucson, Arizona [VIDEOS]

Wed, 10/19/2022 - 21:52

On October 19th, Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake held a rally in Tucson alongside Virginia Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, where the two took turns decimating Arizona Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs’ policy prescriptions while delving into how Lake will set Arizona on the right track to prosperity.

Speaking to an ignited crowd gathered in Tucson’s Whiskey Roads, Lake detailed some of the concerns Arizonans have pertaining to the southern border – such as drugs flooding the state and falling into the hands of youths – and touted her oft-cited plans to declare an invasion on Arizona’s southern border.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

“One of the people asked last night is, they said, ‘What are we supposed to do? We moms and dads, we’re getting ready to go trick or treating, and now we’ve got the fentanyl pouring in and it looks like candy. How do we protect our kids?’ And it’s sad that we even have to ask questions like that. It’s sad that our federal government has allowed this border to be wide open, allow criminals to come in, allow drugs to pour in, and they’ve done nothing about it. And that’s why we have to elect a governor who’s going to secure that border, starting on day one, when we declare an invasion on our border.”

Another area Lake commented on related to a topic that has captivated the nation: education. The Trump-endorsed candidate proclaimed that public schools are not meant to be indoctrination vehicles for socialism and the ilk, but are meant to prepare the youth in a manner that they can flourish in the economy they’ll inherit once they attain the age of majority.

“It’s not to indoctrinate them, it is not a turn them into socialists, it’s not to confusion about their gender – the purpose of educating our children is to prepare them for the real world. So they’re resourceful, so they’re ready to take on their own life, and they can eventually afford to live in this economy, right? So we’re going to bring back after 10th grade dual track education after 10th grade, you decide if you want to take that college route, and go with a four year college – if so great. But if you don’t want to do that, then we’re going to bring trade skill training, vocational training, and career certification training in our high schools.”

In terms of policy that would undoubtedly be attractive to Republican and Democrat voters alike, Lake shared her intentions to cut state taxes on groceries and for those who are renters.

“It truly is a plan to help fight the inflation that Joe Biden has created, by returning a half a billion dollars of your hard earned money back to you. We’re going to reduce and get rid of the grocery tax and the rental tax. Somebody said, ‘This isn’t going to help every single Arizonan.’ It’s going to help a lot of Arizonans. We’re gonna send a half a billion dollars back into your pockets. And that’s just the start. We’re going to work every single year to cut taxes, and you know why we’re going to do that? Because one of my heroes, Ronald Reagan, did precisely that.”

Lake explained what’s at stake in this gubernatorial election via highlighting some of Hobbs’ voting record in the Senate and urging attendees to dissuade their friends and family from giving Hobbs their votes.

“We will see California-like policies in Arizona under Katie Hobbs. We already know that when she was in the Senate, she voted against a border wall. She voted against a virtual border wall, she voted against the borders task force that was trying to keep us safe, she even voted against our ability to ask the federal government to recoup some of the costs we pay by having a wide open border. So we’ve got to make sure – obviously, if you’re here you’re not voting for her – but we’ve got to make sure our friends don’t vote for her.”

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1m6iz0","div":"rumble_v1m6iz0"});

Virginia Governor Youngkin took the stage after Lake, invigorating the crowd by getting down to the brass tacks of what a Hobbs administration would be like for Arizona.

“But the distinction couldn’t be more clear: do you want your taxes to go up? Katie Hobbs does. Do you want your border wide open with fentanyl pouring right in? Katie Hobbs does. Do you want to demean and defund police? Katie Hobbs does. Do you want to see inflation run away and steal all of your hard earned money? Katie Hobbs does.”

Governor Youngkin played off the momentum he’d attained from detailing the severe caveats a Hobbs administration would bring by juxtaposing what a Lake administration could bring to the table to everyday Arizonans.

“We’ve got a wide open border that is an absolute national catastrophe. What do they want to do? Invite more in. Friends, they are agents of chaos. America knows it. It’s no wonder she doesn’t want to debate Kari Lake. Let’s go ahead and rehearse. What about inflation? Winner, Kari Lake. What about crime and standing up for law enforcement? Winner, Kari Lake. What about our border and keeping our nation secure and fentanyl out of the hands of innocent Americans? Winner, Kari Lake. No wonder she doesn’t want to debate her.”

The Virginian governor also chimed in on what he believes is at stake this election cycle, asserting to the event attendees that liberty is in jeopardy this November if the appropriate candidate isn’t elected.

“What we know is this is about freedom and liberty. See the left liberal progressives fully believed they know better. See, we know a little bit about freedom and liberty in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The greatest words ever written this hemisphere were penned by a Virginian: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, and among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

Governor Youngkin expanded on the point of American liberties that progressives are ardently working to undermine, emphasizing that such liberties are ones endowed by God and that Hobbs – and those like her – will stop at nothing to upend these rights.

“These are not rights that are given to us by a king or by elites in Washington or Phoenix or Richmond, Virginia. These are rights that are given to us by God Almighty. We have to defend them. We must defend them, which is why it is time for Arizona to go to work. Because on the ballot is the great progress that Arizona has made. Listen, Governor Ducey has brought taxes down, he’s introduced school choice, and I’m telling you, Katie Hobbs wants to take it all away. That’s what she wants to do. And it is time for Kari Lake to shift into high gear and drive Arizona forward.”

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1m6mqz","div":"rumble_v1m6mqz"});

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 19, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Camera Catches The Exact Moment Biden’s Meds Wear Off – This Is Very Strange Behavior [VIDEO]
Concealed Crime: The Perfect Poison – Vaccine-Induced Murder… 5 Months Later [VIDEO]
Two Morbidly Obese Airline Passengers & A Doctor Cause A Stir Online Over Fat Shaming & Fairness

Two Morbidly Obese Airline Passengers & A Doctor Cause A Stir Online Over Fat Shaming & Fairness

Tue, 10/18/2022 - 10:13

Following a bit of a kerfuffle between an unsatisfied flyer and American Airlines that made its way to social media, American Airlines has reportedly opted to issue a coupon to a woman who was quite literally crammed between two obese passengers on a flight earlier in October.

While the matter is somewhat resolved, the larger issue (pun intended) at hand has sparked a curious debate online over how airlines should assure customers are rendered the accommodations they paid for while also tactfully addressing when rotund passengers’ bodies spill over into other people’s seats.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Dare I say it is a debate over the fats and the fat-nots?

On October 10th, Sydney Watson, a social and political commentator with a sizeable fanbase across various social media platforms, took to Twitter to share a couple of photos showcasing her then-ongoing flight experience on an American Airlines flight where she was wedged in between two obese passengers for hours.

In Watson’s original post, she tweeted, “I am currently – literally – WEDGED between two OBESE people on my flight. This is absolutely NOT acceptable or okay. If fat people want to be fat, fine. But it is something else entirely when I’m stuck between you, with your arm rolls on my body, for 3 hours.”

Image Credit: Twitter

As seen in the photos shared by Watson during her flight, the passengers on both of her sides are clearly spilling over into her seat, resulting in her literally being subjected to unwanted touching for the entirety of her flight, which she emphasized in a follow-up post with, “I don’t care if this is mean. My entire body is currently being touched against my wishes. I can’t even put the armrests down on either side because there’s no [fucking] room. I’m sick of acting like fatness to this extent is normal. Let me assure you, it is not.”

Image Credit: Twitter

Watson also clarified that she asked the passengers on both of her sides whether they’d like to be seated right next to each other, with Watson adding they were siblings, which would’ve at least afforded the clenched woman respite on one of her sides – but Watson claimed the obese passengers declined the request.

Image Credit: Twitter

According to iFly.com, American Airlines’ policy pertaining to passengers whose bodies protrude beyond the size of a single seat requires flight attendants locate an additional seat on the flight “whenever one is available,” but if no two adjoining seats are empty on the flight, then the overweight passenger “may be required to purchase a second seat and wait for a new flight.”

Clearly, American Airlines did not even adhere to their own policies regarding wide passengers. So when Watson decided to make a follow-up post on October 10th, tagging American Airlines and captioning the tweet with, “we need to talk,” one would reasonably expect for the airline to redress the matter quickly in some way, shape, or form.

But in today’s world, quite the opposite happened, with American Airlines responding to Watson’s complaint on Twitter with, “Our passengers come in all different sizes and shapes. We’re sorry you were uncomfortable on your flight.”

Image Credit: Twitter

American Airlines began to see some pushback from commenters online who thought the response from the airline was both in poor taste and attempted to diminish a passenger’s complaints about being subjected to unwanted touching for an entire flight.

Responses in support of Watson reasonably highlighted other issues, such as her not getting the entire seat she’d paid for and thus entitled to, as well as why didn’t the airline address the matter on the flight when it was clearly obvious the woman was wedged between two obese passengers.

Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter

For a few days after the online dispute between Watson and American Airlines, things began to calm down – that was until the New York Post republished a piece from News.com.au on October 15th that painted Watson as some kind of villain, likening Watson’s legitimate complaint to being “offensive comments” and championed how “American Airlines later clapped back at Watson, telling her the company didn’t discriminate against any body type.”

Obviously, the column that was originally published on the Australian news site and further bullhorned online by the New York Post was written by someone who skews left politically and bolsters social justice talking points.

With the news spreading through the media, this brought an onslaught of commenters to Watson’s Twitter feed, who decided to defend the honor of fat people. The coordinated attack waged by the rotund against Watson was certainly quite the spectacle, as there hadn’t been this large of a mobilization of fat people since The Biggest Loser was on television.

One commenter proclaimed in the wake of the article, “You should be ashamed of yourself acting like this. You should have some class, since you are a [doctor], and I thought they had some standards! Fat shaming, being cruel, and just plain rude. Who are you to judge? Shame on you!”

(For the sake of context, Watson prefaces her Twitter handle with “Dr.” although she isn’t actually one, as she seemingly touts the title as a bit of a joke)

Image Credit: Twitter

Another Twitter user invoked the absurd term “fatphobia” in their response, writing, “You should be utterly ashamed of yourself for fat shaming. [What the hell] is wrong with you? Honestly. So you were inconvenienced for a bit. If it’s such a problem for you and the seemingly privileged life you have, [then] buy first-class tickets or take a private charter. Shame on you.”

Image Credit: Twitter

There was a litany of other outraged comments directed at Watson in the same vein, hurling accusations of being “fatphobic” or “fat shaming” because some people strangely think that it’s okay for people to be subjected to unwanted touching if said unwanted touching is the result of obese people spilling onto another person’s body.

The mental gymnastics are fascinating.

It seemed as though the ordeal was all said and done after a day or two of bickering amongst the fats and the fat-nots on Twitter, but an update came about on October 17th where American Airlines afforded a monetary peace offering to Watson.

Watson shared the email she’d received from American Airlines, with the company offering “a $150 Trip Credit” as a means to rectify her sullied experience aboard one of their planes earlier in the month, as well as a far better apology than what was previously furnished by American Airlines’ social media employee.

“I sincerely regret the enjoyment and comfort of your flight AA was diminished due to another customer exceeding their seat’s space. We do our best to avoid uncomfortable situations regarding seats. I can understand your disappointment with the situation not being remedied to your satisfaction.”

Image Credit: Twitter

Better late than never, and Watson was at least rendered a modicum of customer service after the feud played out online and in the media. Nonetheless, the social and political commentator, who is known for her humorous takes on things, couldn’t resist one last jab on the topic, ending the saga on Twitter with, “I’d rather take the $150 American Airlines offered me as a refund and give it to someone who needs a PT or a gym membership.”

Image Credit: Twitter

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 18, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Concealed Crime: The Perfect Poison – Vaccine-Induced Murder… 5 Months Later [VIDEO]
Joe Biden Loses Another Battle With His Teleprompter – Squinting, Glassy Eyed & Struggling To Read [VIDEO]
Dr. Naomi Wolf: I Believe We’re in a Biblical Moment [VIDEO]

Parents To Be Guilty Of Child Abuse For Refusing To Affirm False Gender If One VA Lawmaker Has Her Way

Mon, 10/17/2022 - 09:32

ASHBURN, VA – If some lawmakers have their way this legislative session, parents could be criminally charged with a misdemeanor or even a felony should they refuse to refer to their child as whatever gender the child chooses, regardless of their biological sex.

Local ABC affiliate WJLA reported that a lawmaker, Democratic Virginia Delegate Elizabeth Guzman, has already stated that she will be introducing the legislation during this coming session. This comes a month after Governor Glenn Youngkin announced changes to current state policy by the Department of Education regarding students who say they’re transgender in schools: This year, Youngkin reversed previous policy that allowed students who identify as transgender to go by whatever name, gender, and pronoun they choose, and also that says the school will not advise the student’s parents.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

While reportedly thousands of students around the state have walked out of classes due to the change of policy chanting for “trans rights,” Youngkin has stood firm. At a “parents matter” rally at the beginning of the school year, Youngkin said, “These same progressives in Fairfax County actually believe they should lock parents out of their children’s lives. They think parents have no right to know what your child is discussing with their teacher or counselor.”

Guzman, a social worker by trade, has said that her legislation is essentially in response and retaliation for Youngkin’s policy reversal for schools. “The day that Governor Youngkin wanted to implement this policy,” Guzman said, “I immediately texted the policy lead of that committee and said, this is how we’re going to push back.”

“Pushing back” in this case, according to Guzman, is in the form of expanding the state law definition of “child abuse” to include parents who do not “affirm their child’s gender identity or sexual orientation.”

“If the child shares with those mandated reporters,” she said, “what they are going through, we are talking about not only physical abuse or mental abuse, what the job of that mandated reporter is to inform Child Protective Services. And then that’s how everybody gets involved. There’s also an investigation in place that is not only from a social worker but there’s also a police investigation before we make the decision that there is going to be a CPS charge.”

When asked about consequences for a parent failing to call their child a different gender, Guzman said, “Well, we first have to complete an investigation. It could be a felony, it could be a misdemeanor, but we know that CPS charge could harm your employment, could harm their education, because nowadays many people do a CPS database search before offering employment.”

Guzman was also asked what she would say to Republicans who suggest the legislation change would criminalize parents. In response, she said, “No, it’s not. It’s educating parents because the law tells you the do’s and don’ts,” Guzman answered. “So this law is telling you do not abuse your children because they are LGBTQ.”

Further, she said, “The Bible says to accept everyone for who they are. So that’s what I tell them when they asked me that question, and that’s what I will continue to tell people. You know, we all have a commitment to God And for those believers out there, we know that there’s life after life, and there is going to be a conversation between that person and God and that’s what we’re after — to go by what the Bible says. It is not my job to judge anyone. It is my job to help people.

“I think that it’s extremely important that we show that as a community we are ready to accept each other for who they are and whom they love. And this is not a bill that will agitate parents because we haven’t seen any parents to come against it.”

This piece was written by Leah Anaya on October 17, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Concealed Crime: The Perfect Poison – Vaccine-Induced Murder… 5 Months Later [VIDEO]
BLM Activist Says She Wants To ‘Donate’ To Bail Fund Of Woman Accused Of Dismembering Elderly White Woman
Busted: Failed Socialist Dem Candidate Calls For $25/Hour Min. Wage, But Wait Til You See What She Paid Her People

George Floyd’s Family Might Sue Kanye Over Comments About Floyd Dying From Fentanyl, But Do They Really Have A Case?

Mon, 10/17/2022 - 09:28

Apparently, the family of George Floyd is mulling over the idea of bringing a civil suit against Kanye West over comments made during an October 15th podcast appearance where the Grammy award-winning artist appeared to suggest that George Floyd may have died as a result of the fentanyl in his system.

While news outlets and tabloidesque publications are abuzz with headlines spreading the news that Kanye could face some legal headaches, the real question is whether there’s actually any civil case that can be pursued over Kanye’s comments. The short answer is no, but let’s dive into the background of the matter and then detail why Floyd’s family has essentially no civil case here.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

The Source Of The Controversy

On October 15th, Kanye appeared on the podcast Drink Champs, where the eclectic artist was at one point discussing Candace Owens’ documentary on Black Lives Matter that he’d recently watched. During the interview that has since gone viral, Kanye made a brief comment about Floyd’s death, telling the podcast hosts, “They hit him with the fentanyl. If you look, the guy’s knee wasn’t even on his neck like that.”

Now there were a host of other things Kanye said during the interview that has served as a magnet for controversy, but as it relates to the debacle around Floyd’s family considering a lawsuit, these two sentences uttered by Kanye during the podcast appear to be what the mainstream media (and likely Floyd’s family) are latching onto as a reason to sue.

News Spreads That George Floyd’s Family Considers Legal Action

Come October 16th, after clips of Kanye’s appearance on the podcast went viral, a handful of accounts on Twitter began spreading word about how Kanye could be facing a lawsuit over his comments made during the podcast appearance.

One Twitter user wrote, “George Floyd’s family is considering filing a lawsuit against MAGA lunatic anti-semite conspiracist Kanye West after he spread lies about Floyd’s murder to show support for the killer cop. I hope they go through with it and sue the everlasting shit out of him.”

Image Credit: Twitter

That same day, Philip Lewis from HuffPost added a bit more context on the matter via identifying the lawyer at the center of this potential action, writing on Twitter, “Lee Merritt, the attorney who represented George Floyd’s family, says the family is considering a lawsuit over Kanye’s comments.”

Image Credit: Twitter

Heading over to Lee Merritt’s Twitter page, the source for all the hubbub and news articles was posted on the afternoon of October 16th, with the civil rights attorney having written, “While one cannot defame the dead, the family of [George Floyd] is considering suit for Kanye’s false statements about the manner of his death. Claiming Floyd died from fentanyl, not the brutality established criminally and civilly, undermines & diminishes the Floyd family’s fight.”

Image Credit: Twitter

For the sake of context, Merritt got in cahoots with Floyd’s family days after his death in 2020, working alongside the infamous Benjamin Crump during the civil case that led to a hefty settlement for the family. Prior to being attached to the Floyd matter, Merritt had made quite the stir in 2018 over in Texas when he represented a woman who made false rape allegations against a DPS trooper, leading to Merritt issuing a formal apology for bolstering the woman’s false accusations.

Merritt’s work in that Texas case nearly landed himself in jail, as the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee levied 16 contempt charges against him in 2018 for allegedly practicing law in Texas without state licensure (Merritt is only allowed to practice federal law in Texas, not handle state cases). However, Merritt was able to skate past the charges, claiming he was only working as an advocate for certain people and wasn’t doing any state cases.

Background aside, Merritt’s legal practice areas (a.k.a., what he specializes in) are on civil rights cases and forms of personal injury – but things like defamation through libel and slander aren’t amid his wheelhouse of expertise. Despite defamation cases not being among Merritt’s proficiencies, he still managed to mention in his Twitter post the rather large legal speedbump associated with courts finding the dead can’t be defamed postmortem,

But Floyd already being dead after the allegedly defamatory statements were made is one of quite a few problems.

Why The Floyd Family Has No Case Against Kanye West

To go back to Kanye’s comments from the podcast that are the center of this matter, he stated, “They hit him with the fentanyl. If you look, the guy’s knee wasn’t even on his neck like that,” which suggests that the course of legal action the Floyd family would pursue is defamation.

But the glaring issue (which was ironically pointed out by the Floyd family attorney, Merritt) is that the deceased cannot be defamed. The hard facts are that Floyd is already dead, and Kanye’s comments only pertained to the manner in which he thinks Floyd died, which makes the potential civil case nearly dead on arrival if Floyd’s family had the audacity to file one.

Aaron Minc of Minc Law wrote the following about the topic of defaming the deceased:

“Under common law and according to the definition of this defamation, deceased individuals cannot be defamed. Defamation is defined as an act or statement that damages one’s reputation. The dead do not have reputations to damage. The memory of a deceased person can be damaged, but this is not addressed under the tort of defamation. Survivors or descendants of the dead have no legal claim on behalf of a deceased relative’s good name, nor can they collect on behalf of their own interests relative to that person’s reputation.”

Additionally, the Student Press Law Center also addressed the topic, shedding light on the pivotal element in defamation cases that “in America, only a living person can initiate a defamation claim for damages to their reputation.”

Nowhere in Kanye’s statements on the podcast did he defame any surviving relatives of Floyd, which fails one of the very first pillars of a defamation suit, which is that a filed claim must show proof that the statements and/or publication pertain specifically to the person filing the suit. Furthermore, Floyd’s cause of death itself has been a matter of rigorous public debate before and after the trial regarding his death, falling into the realm of matters of public interest that afford generous leeway to expressed opinions.

Yet another pillar that the Floyd family wouldn’t be able to realistically meet in a defamation case is articulating the damages of the alleged defaming, as no existing assets or potential monetary gains of the Floyd family are going to suffer harm as a result of Kanye’s comments – especially considering that claims of a near-same sentiment are posted online likely hundreds of times every day given the exposure and divided opinions of the original case.

The fact of the matter is that despite how badly some may want to see Kanye sued over these comments, the Floyd family just doesn’t have a defamation case.

For more insight into the complexity of defamation cases, check out this November 2021 article exploring whether or not Kyle Rittenhouse has a strong case against news outlets and Big Tech social media platforms.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 17, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Concealed Crime: The Perfect Poison – Vaccine-Induced Murder… 5 Months Later [VIDEO]
BLM Activist Says She Wants To ‘Donate’ To Bail Fund Of Woman Accused Of Dismembering Elderly White Woman
Busted: Failed Socialist Dem Candidate Calls For $25/Hour Min. Wage, But Wait Til You See What She Paid Her People

Busted: Failed Socialist Dem Candidate Calls For $25/Hour Min. Wage, But Wait Til You See What She Paid Her People

Sun, 10/16/2022 - 12:26

CLEVELAND, OH – If there’s one aspect of the Democratic party that folks can count on religiously, it’s the blatant hypocrisy practiced by those from within the party who are always ready to serve a heaping dish of “good for thee, but not for me” – and the latest entry into the Democratic book of double standards is failed Ohio candidate Nina Turner regarding her position on what a minimum wage should be.

Turner previously served in the Ohio State Senate, representing the state’s 25th District from September of 2008 until January of 2015, later shifting to being a Bernie Sanders stalwart for the socialist’s 2016 and 2020 presidential effort. Following Sanders’ failed bid for office, Turner redirected her efforts to taking a stab at Congress, running in the Democratic primary in 2022 for a chance at landing the U.S. House seat representing Ohio’s 11th District.

However, Turner suffered an embarrassing loss to fellow Democrat incumbent Shontel Brown in the primary held on May 3rd, with Rep. Brown walking away with nearly twice the number of votes that Turner had secured. So, with Turner’s political career floundering, it’s no surprise to see that far-left outlet The Young Turks decided to give her a home so as to amplify the socialist nonsense she currently spews on social media.

Speaking of socialist nonsense and Turners’ proximity to Sanders, it’s hardly shocking to see her spout rhetoric pertaining to increasing the minimum wage to some pie in the sky dollar amount (much like Sanders’ mantra about making “the minimum wage a living wage”).

Take for example Turners’ post on Twitter from September 25th which reads, “$7.25? An hour? For someone’s labor? And yall think that’s ok?! Nah. $25/hour minimum wage.”

Image Credit: Twitter

Earlier on that same day, Turner was defending the calls for a $25/hour minimum wage, responding to a Twitter user who was critical of the declaration with, “You know, people love to ask this question, so let me explain: If the minimum wage increased at the rate of productivity since 1960, workers would be paid around $25/hour today. I’m advocating for rational, humane policy, not just randomly choosing numbers.”

Image Credit: Twitter

On October 2nd and 15th, Turner was at it again, simply writing, “$25/hour minimum wage.”

Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter

And these tidbits of Turner’s social media posts are but a small sampling of her cries for there to be a minimum wage in the realm of $25/hour. Which then leads to the question of whether Turner actually practices what she preaches, as in: did she, herself, see that employees who were associated with her failed congressional campaign were netting $25/hour?

The obvious answer to that question is ‘no,’ as evidenced by a still active webpage promoting a job opportunity as a campaign canvasser for Turner’s failed congressional bid.

In a job posting from February 21st on Salary.com by “Nina Turner for Congress,” the campaign was seeking canvassers who were able to fulfill duties ranging from “door-to-door canvassing” to “event staffing” where the hourly wage advertised was $15/hour.

“Full time/part time canvassing job opportunities that pay $15/hour and is flexible with your schedule? The Nina Turner Campaign is looking to recruit, hire and train paid canvassers who will carry the campaign door to door throughout the district.”

The canvasser job posting ironically delved into how, “Turner has dedicated her life fighting for the poor, the working poor and the barely middle class,” in a job posting that, again, is for $15/hour – which is apparently $10/hour less than what Turner considers to be a living wage.

Image Credit: Salary.com

Imagine that: a Democrat who clamors about how the world should be but doesn’t actively perform the calls to action that they demand from others. But Turner is more than just a run of the mill Democrat, as she’s of the Sanders Democratic socialism breed – meaning that Turner doesn’t want to actually see people paid a “living wage” when the payroll is coming out of her pocket.

Particularly, when it comes to this neo-socialism brought about by Sanders, Turner was following the Sanders playbook at every step, as the twice-failed Democratic presidential hopeful was embroiled in his own scandal of demanding a higher federal minimum wage and paying campaign staffers less than what he touted.

A 2019 report from The Washington Post regarding Sanders’ campaign revealed that while the Democratic socialist was making a case for $15/hour federal minimum wage, field organizers for his campaign “were working 60 hours per week at minimum” while receiving an hourly wage of “less than $13.”

It seems as though Turner is cut from the same exact cloth as her socialist mentor, insofar that she demands everyone but herself to uphold a particular wage standard for employees.

But outside of being a total hypocrite, Turner is also a complete moron when it comes to her economic policy prescriptions, as she also champions the concept of what’s commonly referred to as a universal basic income.

Turner highlighted her adoration of what amounts to a monthly allowance for simply existing on October 15th, writing on Twitter, “Raise the minimum wage. $2k/month checks. Tax the rich. Hold corporations accountable for price gouging. Enforce antitrust laws. Make more in America. That’s how we start to solve the affordability crisis.”

Image Credit: Twitter

The portion of the tweet reading “$2k/month checks” is the universal basic income spiel, which is the equivalent of printing funny money. One of the biggest flaws of a $2,000-a-month universal basic income is that the ticket price for that would outweigh what the federal government takes in annually for taxes when one runs the numbers. The federal government pulls in about $3.3 trillion in tax revenue – but universal basic income for about 260 million adults at $2,000-a-month would clock in at about $6.24 trillion annually.

This is where the printing of funny money comes in, because unless the federal government were willing to roughly triple tax revenue (which that would never happen), then the federal government would just have to start printing money, leading to further devaluing of the U.S. dollar.

It is frankly a godsend that Turner’s aspirations for D.C. came to a crashing halt this past May, because not only is she a hypocrite, but her policy prescriptions are also the embodiment of unrealistic utopianism.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 16, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
COVID Injections Crash and Burn – Negative Efficacy – “It’s Causing Your Infection” [VIDEO]
BLM Activist Says She Wants To ‘Donate’ To Bail Fund Of Woman Accused Of Dismembering Elderly White Woman
A Desperate Midterm Ploy: January 6 Committee Votes To Subpoena Trump

BLM Activist Says She Wants To ‘Donate’ To Bail Fund Of Woman Accused Of Dismembering Elderly White Woman

Fri, 10/14/2022 - 20:58

A pro-BLM activist and writer took to Twitter earlier in October in a manner that highlighted both her anti-white racism and her pro-communism sentiments after the woman proclaimed that she wanted to “donate” to the bail fund of a black woman accused of dismembering her elderly white landlord in Chicago.

On October 11th, Chicago Police were called out to a residence located along the 5900 block of North Washtenaw Avenue in order to perform a welfare check on 69-year-old Frances Walker after a tenant at the apartment building informed authorities that they hadn’t seen Walker for some time.

When police arrived at Walker’s residence, officers had noticed blood inside of Walker’s bedroom as well as bloody knives. Upon further investigating of the residence, officers found human remains inside of the freezer – specifically a severed head and dismembered arms and legs. The Cook County Medical Examiner confirmed the human remains were of Walker, but authorities have yet to locate the victim’s torso.

Investigators learned that Walker would rent out rooms inside of her home for women needing shelter, with one of the women Walker welcomed into her home being the suspected killer, 36-year-old Sandra Kolalou. Police learned that Kolalou had been recently served an eviction notice by Walker, and other tenants admitted to investigators that they were afraid of Kolalou and had called the police on her before in the past.

Chicago Chief of Detectives Brendan Deenihan stated that investigators believe that Walker had been killed inside of her bedroom and was subsequently dismembered on the first floor of the residence.

Walker’s personal cellphone had also been found inside of the room Kolalou was renting, with Assistant Cook County State’s Attorney Anne McCord Rodgers saying tenants inside the building were receiving texts from Walker’s phone with odd requests like to give their keys to Kolalou if they intended to move out.

Officers who were on-scene during the initial welfare check attempted to interview Kolalou, but officials say she was uncooperative and simply told the officers that she knew her rights and didn’t want to talk to them. Kolalou then left the scene in a tow truck, which investigators later learned was called out using Walker’s credit card.

Tenants at the scene who witnessed Kolalou enter the tow truck reportedly warned the driver she was dangerous, which their concerns were seemingly warranted, as authorities say the tow truck driver called police later that evening after Kolalou allegedly pulled a knife on him.

Kolalou was subsequently arrested and has since been charged with first-degree murder, concealing homicidal death, and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, with bail being denied during her initial court appearance on October 13th.

Needless to say, the acts that Kolalou is accused of are abhorrent and should be condemned as such, but that didn’t stop 32-year-old Nandini Balial from chiming in online in response to the news of Walker’s murder – captioning a tweet of the news with, “Where’s the bail fund, I wanna donate.”

Image Credit: Twitter

While Balial has since deleted the extremely tasteless post from October 14th, the fact that she thought it clever or cheeky to post the aforementioned serves as a means to illustrate her anti-white racism and pro-communism leanings.

Balial’s family had immigrated to the United States back in 2000 from New Delhi and seems to relish in the victimhood of being an Indian in America, a mental state that undoubtedly worked as the springboard for her anti-white racism.

A cursory review of some of Balial’s Twitter posts (outside of the abhorrent glee over wanting to donate to a bail fund of an accused murderer), her racism is on full display whether expressing joy over the recent passing of the Queen or being afforded an opportunity to denigrate white people in general.

Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter
Image Credit: Twitter

It would likely not come as a shock to learn that Balial holds a disdain for Republicans, but also isn’t terribly fond of establishment Democrats either since they’re not as radically far-left as she would like them to be. Balial was also among those who were throwing a fit about student loan debt forgiveness (prior to Biden trying to get it pushed through, which it is currently being challenged in the courts), complaining this past May about how she accrued “$106K in debt” as a result of her college education.

Image Credit: Twitter

Of course, it’s not as though Balial is swinging for the fences in her career endeavors, as she put her cinema studies degree to use by functioning as a freelance writer where she’s produced sporadic and underwhelming book and tv show reviews for outlets like The Daily Beast and The Week. At one point Balial was briefly a teacher Amon Carter-Riverside high school in Fort Worth, Texas, but she unsurprisingly quit in February of 2021 because her nonsense wasn’t being entertained at the school.

When Balial isn’t being racist or celebrating the murdering of white women, she’s also injecting in her unabashed hatred of police in her lackluster television show reviews, where her review of the show “Paatal Lok” (an Indian cop drama) claimed that, “Cops in every nation on Earth serve to protect the capital of the oppressors,” and there’s “no such thing” as “a good cop.”

In the realm of other unsurprising attributes associated with Balial, she also happens to be among those who champion abortion (and has been an advocate for some time), which the stance seems to fall in line with the rest of the leftist, joyless scolds who are the unfortunate bearers of unflattering portly statures.

But the bigger picture to take in is that there are a lot more people like Balial floating around out there, reveling in their anti-white positions and would love nothing more than to see those of a fairer skin tone suffer in any number of manners or contexts. Balial is a byproduct of the very anti-white racism that has seeped into the mainstream Democratic party that former congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard made mention of earlier in October.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 14, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
EXCLUSIVE: Interview With U.K. Woman Arrested Over Meme That She Didn’t Even Post
COVID Injections Crash and Burn – Negative Efficacy – “It’s Causing Your Infection” [VIDEO]
A Desperate Midterm Ploy: January 6 Committee Votes To Subpoena Trump

A Desperate Midterm Ploy: January 6 Committee Votes To Subpoena Trump

Thu, 10/13/2022 - 21:54

WASHINGTON, DC – On October 13th, the House select committee investigating the January 6 Capitol incident voted in favor of issuing a subpoena for former President Donald Trump to come testify before the committee and provide “relevant documents” that the committee may request.

And while BlueAnons and those who’ve made hating Trump their entire personality find this to be the proverbial big one with the often-mocked chants of “this is it,” “the walls are closing in,” and “let’s fucking go,” the reality is this development is (as CNN regular Van Jones’ infamously said in 2017) a nothing-burger.

It has now been over 21 months – nearly two years at this point – since the incident at the Capitol transpired, yet this charade being conducted by the January 6 committee carries on. And at this stage of the matter, there really isn’t any discernable reason to continue conducting the January 6 committee hearings in the manner they’ve been done thus far short of for partisan political points to behoove Democrats.

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1l8qvw","div":"rumble_v1l8qvw"});

But Democrats and RINOs leading the crusade of the January 6 committee hearings opted to pull seemingly one last big reveal before the midterms in November: voting to subpoena documents and testimony from Trump himself.

The entire stunt reeks of desperation on the part of Democrats while feeding their fervent anti-Trump base that little morsel of copium – and the move to subpoena Trump will, ultimately, amount to a whole lot of nothing.

The Entirety Of The January 6 Committee Hearings Are A Pointless Charade

This is a concept that cannot be stressed enough: the January 6 committee hearings are nothing more than performative theater in the realm of partisan politics. The televised hearings being conducted by these members of Congress are only a few steps removed from some scripted primetime TV drama. Hell, the January 6 committee literally hired “veteran TV executive” James Goldston to produce the hearings for television.

Frankly, the only thing missing from these hearings is that trademark Law & Order “dun-dun” sound played in between scenes, because these January 6 hearings are merely serving up a niche form of primetime entertainment for the folks who get a Viagra-induced stiffy and gleefully snicker every time they hear “orange man bad.”

Employing just an iota of critical thinking toward the January 6 committee hearings would lead a reasonable person to such a conclusion, as every hearing has consisted of the same core ingredients: people saying the Capitol incident was bad, some spiel about democracy is at stake, someone who was once in proximity of Trump trashing him, and then collective crying about the existence of skeptics of the 2020 election who are simply voicing their concerns.

Throughout the entire televised process of the committee endeavors, the hearings have played out like some cheesy must see TV nonsense akin to 1980s and 90s series where viewers were left with a “to be continued…” cliffhanger at the end of the latest episode. But the proverbial season finale of these performative exploits of the House select committee aren’t going to end on a 1980s TV trope of a freeze-frame with all the anti-Trump acolytes jumping for joy.

Because when the House select committee stops beating this dead horse and accepts that the televised hearings are finally done, it’ll be just that – done. There’s no prize at the bottom of the proverbial cereal box that is the January 6 committee hearings, no matter how much fans of the farce want there to be.

And that’s because…

No One Is Going To Jail Or Prison As A Direct Result Of These Hearings

In all of the dramatic installments of the televised January 6 committee hearings, one has yet to see anyone get hauled away in cuffs following any sort of delivered testimony, nor has any one person’s testimony served as a smoking gun leading to another’s arrest.

Aside from individuals who refuse to participate in the testimony/documents process when subpoenaed by the January 6 committee (i.e., Steve Bannon), this committee isn’t sending anyone to jail nor is it uncovering anything of real relevance that can lead to criminal prosecution.

Sure, the committee can compel someone to testify under oath, and whoever is placed before the committee against their wishes can play their own game of pleading the Fifth Amendment (much like what Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward did earlier in 2022) and refuse to answer the committee’s questions.

There are, of course, those who’ve played along with delivering deep-winded testimony before the January 6 committee, with those individuals being among the sort who either see it expedient politically or career-wise, typically offering a heaping serving of talking points like “it was an insurrection” and alluding to Trump being “dangerous to democracy.”

But no matter how much these anti-Trump folks word-vomit before the House select committee when rendering their testimony, none of what they say is going to lead to any criminal prosecutions for anybody – and that includes Trump. Despite news outlets often framing the latest January 6 committee testimony as being some kind of a “bombshell,” it’s typically just someone sharing their opinion on the Capitol incident or introducing hearsay before the House select committee.

While the committee bears subpoena powers to command someone’s appearance, the proceedings are a far cry from any kind of standards associated with the criminal justice system or courtroom procedures, and much of the questioning employed by congressmembers and answers delivered by witnesses wouldn’t even be able to be used or introduced in a court of law.

And the reality is that this committee isn’t going to uncover or expose anything it would hope to find (as in, something against Trump) that hasn’t already been zealously pursued by the Department of Justice.

Rest assured, if there was some gigantic, criminal conspiracy waged by Trump at the center of the Capitol incident, the Department of Justice would’ve already got the wheels turning on that back in 2021. To date, the Department of Justice has levied charges against nearly 920 people over the Capitol incident, and the biggest thing they are tinkering with against the former president is a dispute over whether or not he retained documents that should’ve been in the custody of the National Archives.

The Purpose Of The Hearings Has Always Been About The Midterms

When one looks at the timing of when the televised January 6 committee hearings kicked off, it’s hard not to draw the conclusion that the effort has always been about saving the midterms for Democrats and maintaining a hold on Congress.

The first televised hearing hit the air in June of 2022, affording enough time to potentially impact public opinion in both critical primaries and the midterm elections slated for November 8th.

History has shown that the sitting president’s political party (in this case, Democrats) almost always suffers during the midterms, and Democrats are seemingly hoping that keeping the Capitol incident in the news cycle in the lead-up to the midterms could soften the looming blow coming in November.

And with just over four weeks to go until voting day hits for the 2022 midterms, Democrats opted for the Hail Mary play in the January 6 committee hearings to call for Trump’s testimony – a sign of Democrats’ desperation to salvage what some foresee as an abysmal looking midterm for Joe Biden’s party. The fact of the matter is that this last ditch effort by Democrats just isn’t going to work out in their favor.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 13, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Smoking Gun – The Death Jab Failed – and the Evidence Was There Before FDA Approval [VIDEO]
EXCLUSIVE: Interview With U.K. Woman Arrested Over Meme That She Didn’t Even Post
Portland Police Response Times To Three Gun Calls Near High School Called Into Question

Interview With U.K. Woman Arrested Over Meme That She Didn’t Even Post

Wed, 10/12/2022 - 22:22

SURREY, ENGLAND – A 48-year-old U.K.-based mother of five was arrested earlier in October for allegedly posting memes/messages to an online forum that were deemed “transphobic,” despite zero evidence supporting the claims outside of a “third party” who told police this woman was the owner of the online accounts responsible for the memes/messages.

The arrest of this woman is connected to a broader legal conundrum she’s been plagued with from a serial litigious biological male who self-identifies as being transgender.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

We at Red Voice Media had an opportunity to speak with this woman caught in the middle of this dilemma, where she shared her take on the overall matter, her arrest, and how this has impacted her family.

On October 3rd, Caroline Farrow was arrested at her home under charges alleging she has been harassing online a biological male born as Anthony Halliday, who changed his name to Stephanie Rebecca Hayden in 2018.

Hayden is reportedly a notorious serial litigator who uses the U.K. courts to target those critical of transgenderism, where he often claims to be harassed due to him presenting himself as though he were female. Farrow is quite familiar with Hayden, as the mother of five has been dealing with court filings and accusations of harassment from the delusional male for years now.

But having Surrey Police come barging into Farrow’s home and placing her into cuffs over this radical transgender activist’s assertions is new territory, with Farrow saying the episode has left her family “traumatized.”

“My family are in deep shock and traumatized, especially the children who witnessed the arrest. The activist has previously visited my house and his supporters are now threatening to come and picket my husband’s church. We are all hyper-vigilant and frightened to answer the door.”

According to Farrow, the reasoning behind her arrest consisted of essentially two elements: one being a “long-running Twitter spat” pertaining to Hayden, and the second being “a long-running thread on Kiwi Farms about the complainant. The offensive posts are written about the complainant,” which a purported anonymous third party claimed Farrow had posted to the forum under a pseudonym.

When asked about the description of the online posts attributed to her, Farrow stated, “One is just photoshopped pictures & memes like with the complainant’s face photoshopped into a photo of the Queen. Another is a meme about the Holocaust. Distasteful, but not something I would ever contemplate posting and I don’t have the tech skills to create.”

Not only is Farrow lacking the image editing skills to produce such memes, but she also claims that the Kiwi Farms accounts (one being “RealMuthaForYa” and the other “Kit Kat”) who posted these memes don’t even belong to her.

In Farrow’s mind, she thinks the idea of Hayden latching onto the notion she’s behind these anonymous online accounts is preposterous, saying, “The complainant is so paranoid, he cannot believe that he is so widely loathed. He believes that I must somehow be linked to every account that appears sympathetic towards me.”

Farrow says police “had absolutely no evidence whatsoever” that these postings to Kiwi Farms were from her, emphasizing that point with “they couldn’t have had – it wasn’t me.” Furthermore, Farrow pointed to a civil case in 2020 where Hayden had accused several others of utilizing the Kiwi Farms username “RealMuthaForYa.”

“The activist knew it couldn’t be me, but according to his interview with VICE magazine, [he] said it was a third party who reported me. In other words, one of his flying monkeys.”

The Vice interview Farrow is referring to is an October 6th article detailing her arrest, where the outlet spoke directly with Hayden and bore the claim that the Kiwi Farms postings were reported to police “by a third party.”

Considering that Hayden has previously attributed the “RealMuthaForYa” Kiwi Farms account as allegedly being operated by others in years past (meaning he’s personally familiar with it), it wouldn’t be farfetched to draw the conclusion that Hayden got one of his buddies/associates to file the police report so as to bolster his ongoing legal proceedings against Farrow.

As a result of the nature of the allegations brought forth against Farrow, she says all her “tech was seized in order to prove/disprove I was [operating] these accounts in the absence of any other evidence.”

Aside from the Kiwi Farms postings, there are the Twitter postings referenced in the complaint against Farrow, which she described as, “a long-running Twitter spat which has seen [Hayden] issue 3 civil lawsuits now. He reported me to the police, I believe, to boost his civil claim. I am the third mother he has had arrested on bogus harassment and malicious communications charges.”

Farrow has posted on Twitter in the past about her and others’ dealings with Hayden, which the serial litigator is trying to present as being harassing, but a cursory review of these online postings generally live in the realm of harmless opinions relating to a matter of public interest due to Hayden having frequently used the courts to target critics of him or the transgender ideology.

Since it could be some time before the criminal and civil court matters are done and over with considering Hayden’s well-documented history of abusing the courts, Farrow’s legal fees are understandably accruing. For those interested in helping this mother of five ward off the abuse coming from Hayden and the ilk, they can donate to the legal fundraiser hosted by CitizenGo.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 12, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
20 Million Dead from the Jab, 2.2 Billion Injuries – Analyst Estimates [VIDEO]
Smoking Gun – The Death Jab Failed – and the Evidence Was There Before FDA Approval [VIDEO]
Portland Police Response Times To Three Gun Calls Near High School Called Into Question

‘Gender-Affirming’ Surgeries For Minors, Socialism Supported By WA Congressional Candidate Gluesenkamp Donors

Wed, 10/12/2022 - 11:41

While candidates running for office don’t necessarily have control over whose donations they accept, one can certainly glean quite a bit of knowledge when looking at who is handing their hard-earned dollars over to a campaign. Such is the case with Washington’s Third District Candidate, a Democrat running under the name of Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (which, as previously reported, is not actually her real name).

Two people stand out the most on the list of donors for Perez’ campaign- one because of the person’s previous donations to a health center that may offer dangerous drugs and surgeries to minors, and the other because of his self-professed appreciation of socialism.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Bill Dickey is the owner of Morel Ink and a June 2022 donor of Perez’. In 2016, he also donated $50,000 to the Cascade AIDS Project for the building of Prism Health, which is a health center aimed at serving the LGBTQ community. Prism Health offers what they call “Gender-Affirming Care,” including hormone therapy, referrals to “gender affirming surgeries,” Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) therapy, and behavior health therapy to people of “all ages,” according to the National Provider Identifier website.

Prism Health’s own policy says that they will not “discriminate” against any patient based on age, along with many other factors such as race and immigration status. The website does not clarify whether it will inform a minor’s parents regarding their potential to change their gender via hormones, or irreversibly via surgery, although an email inquiry revealed that the health center only sees patients from the age of 15.

When asked about her support for gender-affirming care, a spokesperson for the Perez campaign said, “Marie believes that medical decisions should be made by patients and their families in consultation with their doctors, working within established professional guidelines and best practices.” The campaign declined to elaborate when asked specifically about minors, parental consent, and irreversible surgeries.

Her opponent, Republican Joe Kent, had much more to say on the matter. He said, “Irreversible surgeries that permanently castrate minors is abhorrent and I will introduce legislation to outlaw it. It’s disappointing that my opponent not only supports these procedures without parental consent but that her campaign is financed by those who are complicit in this crime. The people of our district want a representative who will oppose this mutilation of our children and will defend parental rights.”

The second questionable Perez donor is Larry Kerschner, who donated to her campaign in July of 2022. Kerschner has a colorful social media history, which includes posts pointing towards socialism as the answer to all of America’s problems. This conjoined with Perez’s mechanic shop (Dean’s Car Care) assisting bad actors during the riotous Portland summer of 2020, as made clear in a previous Instagram post, gives concern to her government beliefs.

In a debate with Kent, Perez had said she was offended when it was suggested she supported Communism, Antifa, or their goals during the riots and beyond. However, her company offering “pro bono” repairs of leaf blowers (which were widely used by Antifa to blow law enforcement pepper spray away from rioters) appears to discredit that statement.

The aforementioned Instagram post read, “If you and your leaf blower have been getting busy supporting human rights, we’d like to do what we can to help keep that little machine working right (pro bono) shoot us an email and check your fluids.”

Perez’ has previously called the allegations of her supporting Antifa a “disingenuous and ridiculously misleading attack.” A campaign statement said in part, “In 2020, as tear gas and pepper spray were causing harm to Portland residents, an employee at Marie’s shop once wrote an Instagram post offering to repair broken leaf blowers. That’s it.”

When asked for clarity on her stance regarding socialism given the donor information, the Perez Campaign said, “Marie is a capitalist, and as a small business owner knows first hand [sic] the opportunities that our economic system creates to provide good jobs and a decent standard of living.”

This piece was written by Leah Anaya on October 12, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
20 Million Dead from the Jab, 2.2 Billion Injuries – Analyst Estimates [VIDEO]
Smoking Gun – The Death Jab Failed – and the Evidence Was There Before FDA Approval [VIDEO]
Portland Police Response Times To Three Gun Calls Near High School Called Into Question

Planned Parenthood Has Another Agenda: Turning Kids Trans – Killing Babies Isn’t Enough? [VIDEO]

Wed, 10/12/2022 - 11:35

Amid uncertainty in the abortion industry in various states around the country, it seems as though abortion mill behemoth Planned Parenthood has been slowly placing some proverbial eggs in a different basket – namely the trans agenda currently targeting today’s youth.

Then again, the move from Planned Parenthood is hardly shocking considering that their bread and butter has been terminating pregnancies – in a sense, the promoting and facilitating of chemically castrating youths and young adults seems like it nestles well into the eugenics or population control agenda.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Back in December of 2021, Planned Parenthood produced and released a handful of videos to their YouTube channel surrounding puberty. Of the four videos produced, two were specific to male puberty and female puberty and one was just a general overview of what puberty is.

Image Credit: YouTube

However, one video from the series is titled “Is This Normal? Puberty in Intersex and Non-Binary People, Explained” and serves as an indoctrination vehicle to normalizing transgenderism. It’s also hardly a coincidence that the transgender-themed video has approximately 554K views compared to the male and female puberty videos sitting at respectively 33K and 19K views.

Employing an animation aesthetic in the video in question, the narrator first (and briefly, at that) addresses the realities of intersex individuals – but then quickly diverts to the topic of transgenderism and how puberty blockers are a viable choice and “safe” for developing teens.

All the while, the narrator attempts to instill a mindset into teen viewers (as this is the demographic Planned Parenthood targeted with the video) that they should be able to choose whether or not to pursue a path of chemical and surgical mutilation.

“You gender identity is real. You should be the one to decide what changes you want to make to your body. If you’re transgender or non-binary, you may find that your puberty experiences don’t line up with your gender identity or how you see yourself. That feeling can be uncomfortable, scary, and stressful. If that sounds like you, know that you’re not alone. There are medicines you can take to delay puberty for a while: they’re called puberty blockers. And they work like a stop sign, by holding the hormones testosterone and estrogen that cause puberty changes like facial hair growth and periods. Puberty blockers are safe and can give you more time to figure out what feels right for you, your body, and your gender identity.”

The video then caps things off with a call to action, directing youths to visit Planned Parenthood’s website where there is a section completely dedicated to teenagers.

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1k480q","div":"rumble_v1k480q"});

Visitors of the teen page on Planned Parenthood’s website are greeted with a number of links relating to sex, birth control, and eventually puberty – with a link delving into the topic of puberty blockers. Providing again the notion that a teen’s “gender identity is real,” the webpage is also complete with a “Book an Appointment” interface where someone can jump right into finding a Planned Parenthood location offering “Transgender Hormone Therapy” treatments.

Upon entering one’s zip code into the appointment booking interface after specifically selecting “Transgender Hormone Therapy” as the purpose of the visit to Planned Parenthood, a total of 40 pages’ worth of results are returned (with all but one page having 10 locations listed each).

A cursory look at some of the returned results revealed that specific locations are more than happy to administer puberty blockers to minors, such as the location in Hudson, New York, which gleefully boasts that they offer said services “adolescents.” While this Planned Parenthood location asserts that “parental permission is required” for puberty blockers for kids, the mentioning is hardly underscored.

The Planned Parenthood in Mar Monte, California, takes it a step beyond puberty blockers and outright offers cross-sex hormone treatments (as in testosterone for biological females and estrogen for biological males) to kids as young as 16.

Meanwhile in Massachusetts, Planned Parenthood is vesting quite a bit into the trans agenda, boasting of how they’re now offering “surgical support letters to established patients who are seeking gender affirmation surgery,” while also – again – catering to kids as young as 16 who are looking to get started on puberty blockers or hormone treatments.

Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts has even established a “Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Patient Advisory Council,” where they’re looking to recruit “BIPOC…identifying trans women” to help Planned Parenthood “improve and grow” their services to chemically castrate youths.

As noted by the BBC in an April 2021 report, the data surrounding the effectiveness of puberty blockers or hormone therapy treatments as a means to treat gender dysphoria is simply lacking, and studies purporting it to be effective are tainted by shoddy trials afflicted with pro-transgender biases.

Of course, in the arena of common sense, most mentally balanced individuals can draw the conclusion that chemically castrating kids and sending them on a path that leads to genital mutilation and irreversible damage is simply ghoulish.

But the fact remains that Planned Parenthood is cognizant that their abortion mill days are numbered in certain parts of the country, so the organization seems to be pivoting some of their resources to chemically castrating and directing youths to irreversible sterilization surgeries since they’ll be facing troubles from their standard practice of snuffing out the lives of children before they take their first breath.

The development is proof that Planned Parenthood is, through and through, a vehicle meant to deter life.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 12, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
20 Million Dead from the Jab, 2.2 Billion Injuries – Analyst Estimates [VIDEO]
Smoking Gun – The Death Jab Failed – and the Evidence Was There Before FDA Approval [VIDEO]
Portland Police Response Times To Three Gun Calls Near High School Called Into Question

Portland Police Response Times To Three Gun Calls Near High School Called Into Question

Tue, 10/11/2022 - 16:18

PORTLAND, OR – An investigation by a Portland local NBC affiliate, KGW,  found that the Portland Police Bureau (PPB) was severely lacking in response to three separate mid-September gun incidents near a high school.

The response times for two calls were 25 minutes and an hour and 20 minutes for the gun-related calls, which is high even for their currently low average response times. The third call saw no police response at all- just a phone call and voicemail to the school staff caller around 9:50pm, which was approximately eight hours after the call to 911 was made.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Due to staffing levels, PPB has been averaging 15.6 minutes to respond to high priority calls in 2022, a number that is higher than the two previous years- 12.2 minutes average in 2021 and 10.6 in 2020.

In addition to low staffing, PPB has also seen a reduction in their ability to target gun violence through proactive policing since the disbanding of their Gang Enforcement and Gun Violence Reduction team. Further, the department acquiesced to the public’s demands to rid the schools of School Resource Officers (SROs) in June of 2020, which obviously took away armed officers staffed at the schools during regular school hours.

Rick Puente, Vice President of the Oregon School Resource Officers Association, said that the slow response time to gun violence in schools is hardly a surprise when all these factors are combined. “When you look at the responses that you are getting, we have a gap there,” he said. “I mean — it is pretty evident. When you remove a school resource officer or program, you leave that gap. I always look at it like — you get a flat tire — instead of repairing it, you remove it and keep going down the street on three wheels. It is going to be a bumpy ride.”

Puente also said seconds matter when it comes to police response to calls on or near schools, which is why it was so detrimental to student and staff safety to rid the schools of SROs.

The public outcry for better and faster police response has been received by authorities. However, it’s difficult for police to be able to reduce response times and increase the actions they’re able to take when their staffing has been depleted- due to the anti-police narrative which far-left politicians in the city helped spread- as well as the lessening of programs and resources meant to help close that gap, such as SROs and gun violence targeting teams.

Portland’s Police Chief Chuck Lovell is confident that increasing staffing levels will help with the slow response times. “We’re going to try to get to every call we can,” he said. “We do our best to answer them. And we understand that even if it is not a homicide or a shooting, having your stuff stolen, having your home violated by an intruder is traumatic and we want to do our best to address those with the resources we have.”

A PPB spokesperson told KGW that they’re “looking into” why the response times for these three gun incidents at Franklin High School were so long, but there has been no follow up on that at the time of this writing.

Chief Lovell has said that he is in favor of reinstating a gun violence unit to fight the growing crime, as well as increasing staffing and bringing in the use of Shotspotters- which report possible gunshots in real time to dispatchers.

This piece was written by Leah Anaya on October 11, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
20 Million Dead from the Jab, 2.2 Billion Injured – Analyst Estimates [VIDEO]
Traditional Vaccines Now in Question: Dr. Harvey Risch Loses All Trust in the CDC and the FDA [VIDEOS]
Smoking Gun – The Death Jab Failed – and the Evidence Was There Before FDA Approval [VIDEO]

Why Prostitution Should Never Be Legalized

Mon, 10/10/2022 - 19:17

A topic that has been popular among Democrats and Libertarians for some time now is the concept that “sex work is real work,” and that prostitution should be legalized and treated/regulated much like any other business in the realm of transacted commodities.

Outside of the arguments revolving around consenting adults participating in purportedly harmless commerce, proponents of prostitution genuinely think that not only is the act harmless – but that legalizing prostitution will suddenly make all the problems associated with the practice essentially disappear.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

This is, of course, completely misguided nonsense.

When it comes to claims that legalizing and regulating all facets of prostitution will somehow lessen the harm that comes with it and that such a vocation can be liberating, these ill-conceived notions are likely from the sort who envision prostitution as being something akin to the 1990 movie “Pretty Woman.”

But there’s nothing glamorous about whoring oneself out, with or without the government’s blessing, and the harms that come with it won’t simply dissipate just because the government suddenly takes the place of the pimp.

To normalize sex as something that can literally be purchased by any would-be consumer is the epitome of objectifying women, and codifying prostitution as a legal trade would make many of the problems associated with the destructive market more complex to address.

Take for example the already-existing issues of violence, rape, and human trafficking associated with prostitution on the black market. If prostitution were legalized nationally, these criminal acts fostering under prostitution wouldn’t magically vanish – and they would arguably become more difficult to pursue/prosecute.

In a scenario where a legal prostitute is raped by a paying client, it would be the prostitute who would have to file the complaint against the offender and harbor the burden of proving she was forced during the act – all the while, the act itself was preceded by a transaction for literal sex.

If a sexual assault occurs following such a sordid transaction, how would a prostitute be able to convincingly prove they were forced to have sex when the very nature of their working conditions involves sex in exchange for money? To imply that decriminalizing or legalizing the entire industry will safeguard prostitutes is debatably a cruel falsehood. Someone whose very source of income makes them vulnerable to the possibility of being raped cannot be protected by making the transactional aspect of the market legal.

And then there’s the human trafficking aspect of the argument, where some proponents of legalized prostitution think that if the act is legalized then victims of sex trafficking will somehow cease to be – but again, this couldn’t be further from the truth.

As numerous prostitution busts over the years have shown, underage victims of human trafficking are often found to be linked to or in close cohorts with larger networks of adult prostitutes. If prostitution were suddenly legalized, this wouldn’t weed out the organized crime industry trafficking in young victims – instead, it would give these traffickers an opportunity to conduct their exploits under the façade of a legitimate business front with arguably a lot less police oversight.

Of course, there are some who proclaim that legalizing prostitution would be great for increasing tax revenue. This is another misguided thought, as Germany legalized it back in 2001 and Julie Bindel from Justice for Women noted back in 2013 that the sought-after tax money wasn’t pouring in like expected.

“The Dutch government hoped to play the role of the honorable pimp, taking its share in the proceeds of prostitution through taxation. But only 5% of the women registered for tax, because no one wants to be known as a whore — however legal it may be.”

And with legalization of prostitution would also come the reality of it becoming the target of litigious opportunists and even legitimate lawsuits, such as lawsuits alleging various forms of discrimination against would-be consumers or allegations of false pricing/overcharging. In a legalized context, every time a prostitute refused service to a would-be consumer could expose the prostitute to potential litigation if the declination of services was perceived as discriminatory.

Then there are those who would argue that legalizing and regulating prostitution would pose a net positive in the arena of STD prevention. Once again, a concept that fails the sniff test at every level. Indeed, there are countries that have legalized prostitution and have instituted the likes of health check cards for prostitutes to show they’ve been screened for STDs. However, getting a full panel of STD testing results takes about 48 hours in the most favorable of circumstances, meaning that a prostitute’s health check card showing they’re in the clear for STDs is about as reliable as a pregnancy test taken two days before someone sleeps with a few dozen guys.

Another very real line of consequences that will come from legalized prostitution are issues surrounding prostitutes becoming pregnant by clients and the messes that would spill out into the family courts. Aside from there having to be a whirlwind of paternity tests issued in the wake of a prostitute becoming pregnant, there would then be ensuring legal questions of whether a client could be compelled to pay child support to a prostitute who carried his child to term.

The idea that prostitution should be legalized is simply wrong on all fronts. Sex work isn’t real work, it’s not “liberating” for women, and it’s certainly not good for the next generation of men to be conditioned into thinking it’s a normal and innocuous thing. As for the people who would contend otherwise under the guise of some of the common arguments mentioned in this article, their ilk clearly have not taken the time to earnestly examine the merits of their talking points.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 10, 2022. It originally appeared in RedVoiceMedia.com and is used by permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Traditional Vaccines Now in Question: Dr. Harvey Risch Loses All Trust in the CDC and the FDA [VIDEOS]
20 Million Dead from the Jab, 2.2 Billion Injured – Analyst Estimates [VIDEO]
Washington State Congressional Candidate Using Fake Name For Campaign, Registered To Vote In Two States

Katie Hobbs Quietly Admits To Supporting Supporting Killing The Unborn Up Until Birth [VIDEO]

Sun, 10/09/2022 - 19:21

On October 9th, Arizona Democratic gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs tacitly admitted to supporting abortions up until birth while appearing for an interview on CBS News’ “Face The Nation,” telling the show host that the decision to have an abortion should solely rest between the mother and her doctor when directly asked if there was a specific week-limit Hobbs would sign-off on for non-medically necessary abortions.

Despite abortions often being coined as “healthcare” by the pro-abortion crowd and activists, the reality is that the overwhelming majority of abortions performed don’t serve any kind of legitimate healthcare purpose. In fact, a 2004 study revealed that about collectively 7% of abortions performed are meant to address health concerns for either the mother or child in utero. As for those who clamor about rape and/or incest, those reasons only account for about 1.5% collectively.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

The reality is that roughly 91.5% of abortions performed are done so as to cater to desired conveniences, be they economic-related, career aspirations, not ready to be a parent, and a host of other reasons generally residing under the umbrella of conveniences.

Ever since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade this past June, the topic of abortion was thrust into the sphere of political discourse, which is a topic that, while not the largest issue to the majority voters, is one where candidates’ political stances on the matter can significantly impact how certain voters will react at the ballot box.

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Roe v. Wade, the likes of studies and polls began coming out in all directions, where these studies generally touted the same conclusion that a majority of Americans support abortion. But the fact is the topic of abortion is far more nuanced than a simple “do you or don’t you support it” approach to understanding the collective sentiments surrounding abortion.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to ascertain that the average American if randomly approached about their stance on abortion, would render different opinions on abortion when presented with different scenarios and periods of gestation. Nuance is everything, and most Americans would likely signal the evident morality issues of someone seeking an abortion, say a few weeks after conception, versus someone at 28-weeks gestation.

Frankly, randomly asking someone if they simply support abortion would be akin to asking someone if they support eating meat: chances are you’d get a “yes” to that question, but it doesn’t mean someone who supports eating meat would be on board with people cooking up the family dog or cat for dinner.

With the aforementioned in mind, it’s no wonder that Americans across the political aisle want to know candidates’ hardline stances on abortion – as in whether or not the candidate supports abortion and up to what point should a non-medically necessary abortion be allowed to take place.

And with Arizona Democratic gubernatorial candidate Hobbs, she showed her hand on October 9th pertaining to where she stands on the topic, as she exposed herself as implicitly being in favor of abortions up until birth.

CBS News’ Major Garrett asked Hobbs, “On the question of abortion, your opponent [Kari Lake] described you as something of an extremist, those are her words, not ours. Do you support the current 15-week ban in Arizona? Or would you seek a different approach? And is there a week limit different than 15 weeks you are in favor of? And if so, why?”

In response, Hobbs stated, “I don’t support the 15-week ban,” going on to add that “late-term abortion is extremely rare” and asserting that if a woman is seeking a late-term abortion, then it must mean “something has gone incredibly wrong in a pregnancy.” Without any evidence to back up the claim, Hobbs went on to state, “A doctor’s not going to perform an abortion late in a pregnancy just because somebody decided they want one.”

Yet, Hobbs interestingly avoided answering Garrett’s direct question of if there’s “a week limit different than 15 weeks” that Hobbs would be “in favor of” – something that Garrett picked up on in his follow-up question to the Democratic candidate.

“What would the Hobbs administration’s week limit be for abortion access? If it’s not 15 weeks? What is it?”

Again, Hobbs wouldn’t directly answer the question, responding with, “Look, abortion is a very personal decision that belongs between a woman and her doctor. The government and politicians don’t belong in that decision, we need to let doctors perform the care that they are trained and take an oath to perform.”

The CBS News’ personality seemed to be catching on to what Hobbs was alluding to in her answer, asking the clarifying question of, “So if an Arizona voter were to conclude from your previous answer, that you do not favor any specific week limit on abortion, would they be correct?”

It was at this point that Hobbs let the proverbial cat out of the bag, telling Garrett, “I support leaving the decision between a woman and her doctor and leaving politicians entirely out of it.”

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1kn0lm","div":"rumble_v1kn0lm"});

Hobbs saying that she wants to leave “politicians entirely out” of the issue of abortion would, by extension, include elected legislators, therefore meaning she supports abortion up until birth since she doesn’t want to see anything codified within Arizona that would instill timeline restrictions on obtaining a non-medically necessary abortion.

In Hobbs’ vision for what the abortion industry in Arizona should look like, there’d be no difference between someone taking the morning-after pill versus someone days before going into labor deciding to end the life of their child.

This piece was written by Gregory Hoyt on October 9, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Traditional Vaccines Now in Question: Dr. Harvey Risch Loses All Trust in the CDC and the FDA [VIDEOS]
Entire Uvalde School District Police Force Gets Some Bad News
Washington State Congressional Candidate Using Fake Name For Campaign, Registered To Vote In Two States

MIDTERM ELECTIONS: 55% Believe Cheating Affected 2020 Outcome, HALF OF VOTERS Expect Widespread Cheating in Midterms [VIDEO]

Sun, 10/09/2022 - 10:18

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u1vds3"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v1khhtu","div":"rumble_v1khhtu"});

As we approach midterm elections, Rasmussen reports that nearly half of surveyed voters expect widespread cheating. Rasmussen’s Mark Mitchell joins Emerald Robinson on Absolute Truth to discuss the survey’s results.

**Let’s Connect!  Join Our Community**

Two surveys were taken regarding the upcoming midterms. The first took a step back to look at the 2020 presidential election: “…Rasmussen Reports asked 1000 People How likely is it that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election? 33% said it was very likely, 22% said somewhat likely, only 11% said it wasn’t very likely, and 29% said… Not at all likely. 5% said they weren’t sure.”

Image Credit: UngaTheGreat

Mitchell breaks down party affiliation of those who believe there was likely election fraud—points out that only 29% believe that cheating affecting the 2020 election was not likely.

“…if you look at the party breakdowns, Republicans are more suspicious; obviously, 75% Say cheating likely affected the outcome of the 2020 election. But still, 53% majority of independents say the same thing. And 35% of Democrats. And I think it’s also telling to look at the people who say Nope; it’s not at all likely cheating happened. That’s only 29% of voters. So less than a third of voters are absolutely confident that the cheating is not affecting the outcome of the election, but only 8% of Republicans. So Republicans have absolutely no confidence in our electoral system.”

Image Credit: UngaTheGreat

The next was looking forward to the 2022 midterms:

“…another new Rasmussen report poll out to it asked 1000 People How likely is it that there will be widespread cheating that will affect the outcome of this fall’s congressional elections? 25% said very likely, 24% said somewhat likely, 18% said not very likely. And 23% said not at all likely.”

Image Credit: UngaTheGreat

The most concerning message produced from these surveys is that only 9% of Republicans (36% of Democrats) have confidence in our electoral system and believe cheating is not likely in the upcoming midterms. As evidence of election fraud continues to become too obvious to hide, more voters are learning the truth of what happened during the ‘The Big Steal’ of 2020.

This piece was written by Unga The Great on October 9, 2022. It originally appeared on RedVoiceMedia.com and is used with permission.

Read more at RedVoiceMedia.com:
Dr. Naomi Wolf: CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Is Responsible for Mass Murder [VIDEOS]
Entire Uvalde School District Police Force Gets Some Bad News
Traditional Vaccines Now in Question: Dr. Harvey Risch Loses All Trust in the CDC and the FDA [VIDEOS]

Pages